<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Zack of All Trades &#187; social</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zackofalltrades.com/tag/social/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zackofalltrades.com</link>
	<description>… and master of, um… let me get back to you on that…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:41:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Statistical analysis of facebook profile pictures</title>
		<link>http://zackofalltrades.com/2008/03/statistical-analysis-of-facebook-profile-pictures/</link>
		<comments>http://zackofalltrades.com/2008/03/statistical-analysis-of-facebook-profile-pictures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zack Williams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zackofalltrades.com/2008/03/statistical-analysis-of-facebook-profile-pictures/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is totally naval gazing, but I think it's kind of interesting what people use as their Facebook profile pictures.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is totally naval gazing, but I think it&#8217;s kind of interesting what people use as their <a href="http://www.facebook.com/">Facebook</a> profile pictures.   So, in a fit of sociological curiosity, I decided to count em&#8217; up broken down by gender:</p>
<p><strong>Men</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Just themselves: 9</li>
<li>In a public situation with others: 3</li>
<li>In formal wedding attire: 2</li>
<li>With spouse: 2</li>
<li>With pet: 1</li>
<li>&#8220;Artistic rendition&#8221;: 1</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Women</strong> </p>
<ul>
<li>With spouse: 2</li>
<li>In formal wedding attire: 1</li>
<li>In formal wedding attire with spouse: 1</li>
<li>Just themselves: 1</li>
<li>With pet: 1</li>
<li>Obviously photoshopped: 1</li>
<li>Landscape photo with nobody in it: 1</li>
</ul>
<p>What I can gather from this is that if you&#8217;re male, you&#8217;re much more likely to put a picture of your manly bod or something that portrays you as being cool or social as your profile picture.  </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re female, you&#8217;re likely to put up a picture that indicates that you&#8217;re &#8220;taken&#8221; (if that&#8217;s the case).  On the whole the women put up more a more diverse, creative set of pictures. </p>
<p>This analysis is probably skewed by my particular data set, but it&#8217;s just interesting nonetheless. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zackofalltrades.com/2008/03/statistical-analysis-of-facebook-profile-pictures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.163 seconds -->
